Updated – March 4, 2016 See Summary of events @ http://musicbizadirtygame.blogspot.com/2016/02/exploring-new-legal-strategies.html
February 17, 2016 Added Petition for Review Judicial Council, Their decision and Ruling of the Administrative Offices of the Court.
The final Petition for Review of Complaint of Judicial Misconduct is available at: https://exercisingmyright.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/new-doc-11.pdf! This PDF summarizes the entire process, from allegations to highlighting how courts own officers ignored courts rules.
(A copy of the Original Complaint – Lovelace vs. Dekalb County Police Dept.(GA) is at the bottom of this page!)
Immediately below is a copy of the Complaint of Judicial Misconduct recently filed in 2015 (which includes background summary). I appreciate your discretion in protecting confidential information. I am seeking legal representation with regards to my allegations involving Dekalb County, the courts in the Northern District of GA and the COA-Court of Appeals.
Please take the time necessary to review my requests for assistance and let me know whether you or your firm would be willing to consider assisting or providing proper representation.
I have reached out to one of the legal aids organizations but in spite of ‘obstruction’ and many other unethical behaviors…some have attempted to use the statutes of limitations to dissuade even though the laws clearly state ‘statutes of limitations are not applicable. I may not be an attorney but like many others, I love reading and studying case laws and the constitutional laws, etc…
I am constantly misrepresented by those who are in a position to thwart justice and I do not have to tell you how people rally against you when suing governmental agencies; such as, the police. The first thing that is said is, “It’s YOUR tax dollars…” No one realizes that this only supports and condone continued civil rights violations.
Again, I recognize that this is an extremely difficult task but I have faith that this can be remedied.
Thank you for your consideration,
I have copied each page of the COM: Complaint of Misconduct….if this PDF Embedder Plug-in does not load properly!
(C.O.A. Clerk stamped but no Docket # assigned)
NOTE: Below is a copy that was given when I asked for a stamped copy with Docket # (weeks later)! Per Court Rules, the Clerks were supposed to Stamp All filings and assign a Docket # upon submission.
NOTE: At a later time, the Courts provided me with a Copy of my Complaint but it has different date for submission.
This is a scanner picture of the 1st page of Judicial Complaint provided by Courts of Appeal Clerks in GA (weeks later). It does not matter what reason that the C.O.A. Clerks provide for these difference…the Court Rules were not followed. The Complaint process was not followed in that Clerks should Stamp and Assign a Docket # for Judicial Complaints upon receipt. They should not exercise the option to delay and edit dates of filings!
I also notice that the Courts added Docket #’s next to each Judge’s name after submission…on the Complaint edited by Clerk! If I did not ask weeks later for a copy of the first page for my records, I would not have received this copy to compare.
These PDF’s summarizes the entire process, from allegations to highlighting how courts own officers ignored courts rules. This is only after the raping, bullying, violence and intimidation…(The initial Complaint of Judicial Misconduct is below the summarized petitions and request for review)
Cover Letter & Judicial Misconduct Petition – Pages 1- 6
This is the Stamped Cover for the following Petition (Full Copy below):
Petition for Review of a Judicial Council Decision (Pages 1 – 24)
The Full Complaint of Judicial Misconduct
If a Plaintiff submits the (4) four Required BOUND copies to the Courts Clerk, why would they require an unbound copy?
This should have been stamped and assigned a docket # at time of submission, per Court Rules…
This video clearly shows clerk’s misconduct when receiving Judicial Complaint of Misconduct. Afterward, the executive clerk requested unbound copies although video shows that I submitted (4) bound copies. I provided 82 pages which included clear, undeniable proof of misconduct but the ruling stated that I did not provide supporting documentation. When I requested a cover sheet because the initial clerk only provided a generic date stamp, the executive clerk gave me a copy which was completely different from the generic stamp and it included the case docket number but it did not reflect that it came from my bound copies. The ruling still never addresses that the courts ignored clerks were supposed to serve Defendants.
Keep in mind that the reason for the filing of the COMPLAINT OF MISCONDUCT was due to this same kind of ‘switch-a-roo‘ and obstruction.
When reviewing the (80+) eighty plus pages above, even a child can see that this is more than a substantial amount of evidence so how can it be said that there is no evidence to support…unless – not given the complete bound 80+ page filings.
This is the video that was taken just prior to driving to Courthouse. It shows the actual Complaint with highlighting some of the proof. It clearly shows ‘book-like’ over 80 pages which demonstrates every allegation (some of which was captured on camera.
I also have video footage of the clerk stamping the submissions but not assigning docket number.
COA CLERK DID NOT FOLLOW PROCEDURE because there was no docket number assigned and the stamp used was not initialed. In fact, when I question him about the Docket #…
Kennerly gave me the copy of the first page that was stamped with different stamp and it was initialed as it should have been when filed. When I met with Kennerly to give him the requested unbound copy, he provided me with a copy of the first page of the C.O.M. with a Docket # (finally) but it was nothing like the copy that the courts initially returned.
The video is really scratchy and long but just a little past half way, you will hear and see clerk receives all copies but only stamps my copy and one. Clearly tells me that she will stamp one copy and ‘they’ will send me a docket number later or next week.
I will upload after I cut to specifics…soon!
Although (4) Bound copies were submitted. Executive clerk ask for unbound copy of COM: Complaint of Judicial Misconduct…
Shortly afterward, the Chief Judge rules that ‘there was no supporting evidence…’ as if he did not receive a copy of the 80+ pages (listed above). The Chief Judge Ed Carnes, never addressed the proof that the Courts ignored that the Clerks duty to process Service. See Below:
(KEEP IN MIND THAT THEY WANT RIGHTS SO THEY’RE NAMES PROTECTED BUT I HAVE BEEN THROWN TO THE PUBLIC FOR DECADES…)
DID YOU SEE THOSE 80+ PAGES OF CLEAR PROOF OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT?
I have the letter with all of the names included but I’m sure that there is a reason that they sent a redacted copy along with the standard letter. It’s funny that they will enforce the laws for their own purposes and cover ups but god forbid that you want to have your rights enforced against the powerful.
BY THE WAY, THE COURTS STAMP IS SQUARE WITH NAMES AND INITIALS!
THE NEXT STEP IN THE COMPLAINT PROCESS DICTATES THAT A REQUEST FOR REVIEW OFTHE CHIEF JUDGES RULING
JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT PETITION for
Judicial Complaint No’s 11-15-90101 through 11-15-90104
BELOW IS A PDF EMBEDDER BUT JUST IN CASE OF TECHNOLOGICAL ISSUE…HERE IS A COPY OF COVER LETTER with THE JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT PETITION which addresses the Chief Judges statement of COMPLAINT ‘lacking evidence…’