For many years, I have been seeking legal assistance with serious violations of constitutional laws. Throughout the years, I have been given many reasons as to why no one will help me…
I have been told that I am in the wrong country. I was told that I blamed the wrong people for my copyright infringements. It has been implied that I am the reason people have been negatively impacted: yet, I received no communication or explanation – just blame.
Many blame ‘my situation’ on racism and sexism, while ‘my public’ has mocked, harassed and laughed while making it a point to imply that both; blacks and whites have united in denying any resolution due to possible violence stemming from onset. For decades, I have been told that nothing will ever change and that I should kill myself.
Every reason that can be thought of to induce public’s support in denying me resolution and some have even gone so far as to spread vicious rumors of me being a child molester (which is a lie).
I am only guilty of attempting to exercise my civil and human rights that apparently that a lot of powerful individuals feel that I am not supposed to have because others are more popular! I have always worked, legally protected myself and secured proper documentation when conducting business.
I have also copied each page of the COM: Complaint of Misconduct if the PDF Embedder Plug-in fails to load properly!
If a Plaintiff submits the (4) four Required BOUND copies to the Courts Clerk, why would they require an unbound copy?
This should have been stamped and assigned a docket # at time of submission, per Court Rules…
This video clearly shows clerk’s misconduct when receiving Judicial Complaint of Misconduct. Afterward, the executive clerk requested unbound copies although video shows that I submitted (4) bound copies. I provided 82 pages which included clear, undeniable proof of misconduct but the ruling stated that I did not provide supporting documentation. When I requested a cover sheet because the initial clerk only provided a generic date stamp, the executive clerk gave me a copy which was completely different from the generic stamp and it included the case docket number but it did not reflect that it came from my bound copies. The ruling still never addresses that the courts ignored clerks were supposed to serve Defendants.
Keep in mind that the reason for the filing of the COMPLAINT OF MISCONDUCT was due to this same kind of ‘switch-a-roo‘ and obstruction.
When reviewing the (80+) eighty plus pages above, even a child can see that this is more than a substantial amount of evidence so how can it be said that there is no evidence to support…unless – not given the complete bound 80+ page filings.
This is the video that was taken just prior to driving to Courthouse. It shows the actual Complaint with highlighting some of the proof. It clearly shows ‘book-like’ over 80 pages which demonstrates every allegation (some of which was captured on camera.
I also have video footage of the clerk stamping the submissions but not assigning docket number.
COA CLERK DID NOT FOLLOW PROCEDURE because there was no docket number assigned and the stamp used was not initialed. In fact, when I question him about the Docket #…
Kennerly gave me the copy of the first page that was stamped with different stamp and it was initialed as it should have been when filed. When I met with Kennerly to give him the requested unbound copy, he provided me with a copy of the first page of the C.O.M. with a Docket # (finally) but it was nothing like the copy that the courts initially returned.
The video is really scratchy and long but just a little past half way, you will hear and see clerk receives all copies but only stamps my copy and one. Clearly tells me that she will stamp one copy and ‘they’ will send me a docket number later or next week.
I will upload after I cut to specifics…soon!
Although (4) Bound copies were submitted. Executive clerk ask for unbound copy of COM: Complaint of Judicial Misconduct…
Shortly afterward, the Chief Judge rules that ‘there was no supporting evidence…’ as if he did not receive a copy of the 80+ pages (listed above). The Chief Judge Ed Carnes, never addressed the proof that the Courts ignored that the Clerks duty to process Service.
DID YOU SEE THOSE 80+ PAGES OF CLEAR PROOF OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT?
I have the letter with all of the names included but I’m sure that there is a reason that they sent a redacted copy along with the standard letter.
It’s funny that they will enforce the laws for their own purposes and cover ups but god forbid that you want to have your rights enforced against the powerful.
BY THE WAY, THEIR STAMPS ARE SQUARE WITH NAMES AND INITIALS..